![Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others (23199/16) [2017] ZAGPPHC 151](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000648826_resized_legallawjudiciarycourt1022scales.jpg)
Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others (23199/16) [2017] ZAGPPHC 151
12th May 2017 Initially there were two applications for leave to appeal, one brought by the first respondent, the Minister, who at the hearing was represented by... →
![Mabuza v Phosa (8018/2015) [2017] ZAGPPHC 139](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000646935_resized_law11022.jpg)
Mabuza v Phosa (8018/2015) [2017] ZAGPPHC 139
5th May 2017 The plaintiff is the present Premier of the Mpumalanga Province. He is a senior, and, by all accounts, influential member of the African National... →
![Earthlife Africa Johannesburg and Another v Minister of Energy and Others (19529/2015) [2017] ZAWCHC 50](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000644986_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary221022.jpg)
Earthlife Africa Johannesburg and Another v Minister of Energy and Others (19529/2015) [2017] ZAWCHC 50
26th April 2017 In late 2013, the Minister (with NERSA’s concurrence), acting in terms of sec 34 of ERA determined that South Africa required 9.6GW (‘gigawatts’)... →
![Molefe and Others v Minister of Transport and Others (17748/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 120](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000641780_resized_gavelandscalesofjusticelegallaw1022.jpg)
Molefe and Others v Minister of Transport and Others (17748/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 120
11th April 2017 [1] To set the scene this matter concerns the decision taken on 8 March 2017 by the Minister of Transport ("the Minister") to dissolve the Board of... →
![Media 24 Limited v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, In re: S v Van Breda (5027/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 37](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000641664_resized_gavel2legallaw1022.jpg)
Media 24 Limited v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, In re: S v Van Breda (5027/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 37
11th April 2017 [1] The National Director of Public Prosecutions and the Accused, the first respondent and the second respondent respectively, both continue to... →
![Molefe and Others v Minister of Transport and Others (17748/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 120](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000641657_resized_legallawjudiciarycourt1022scales.jpg)
Molefe and Others v Minister of Transport and Others (17748/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 120
11th April 2017 [1] To set the scene this matter concerns the decision taken on 8 March 2017 by the Minister of Transport ("the Minister") to dissolve the Board of... →
![Media 24 Limited v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, In re: S v Van Breda (5027/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 35](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000640386_resized_gavelandscalesofjusticelegallaw1022.jpg)
Media 24 Limited v National Director of Public Prosecutions and Others, In re: S v Van Breda (5027/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 35
6th April 2017 [1] Time constraints, regrettably, do not permit me to give this matter greater consideration. [2] The application came before me as one of urgency... →
![Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another (5950/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 34](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000639785_resized_gavelandscalesofjusticelegallaw1022.jpg)
Democratic Alliance v President of the Republic of South Africa and Another (5950/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 34
5th April 2017 [1] This is an urgent application by the Democratic Alliance (‘DA’) for interim relief pending a proposed application for judicial review which the... →
![Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others (23199/16) [2017] ZAGPPHC 68](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000635358_resized_law11022.jpg)
Helen Suzman Foundation and Another v Minister of Police and Others (23199/16) [2017] ZAGPPHC 68
20th March 2017 These are judicial review proceedings in terms of Rule 53 of the Uniform Rules of Court in relation to the decision of the Minister of Police, the... →
![Fines 4 U (Pty) Limited and Another v Sherman and Others (30586/2014) [2017] ZAGPPHC 57](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000629792_resized_legallawjudiciarycourt1022scales.jpg)
Fines 4 U (Pty) Limited and Another v Sherman and Others (30586/2014) [2017] ZAGPPHC 57
28th February 2017 AARTO came into effect on 1 July 2007. 4] When the events forming the subject of this dispute took place, AARTO was still in an implementation... →
