![South African Reserve Bank v Public Protector and Others (43769/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 443](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000671768_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary1022.jpg)
South African Reserve Bank v Public Protector and Others (43769/17) [2017] ZAGPPHC 443
17th August 2017 1. The applicant, the South African Reserve Bank, (“the Reserve Bank”) seeks urgent relief setting aside the remedial action taken by the first... →
ABSA vs Public Protector and Others
17th July 2017 The purpose of this application is to review the remedial action in paragraphs 7.1.1, 7.1.1.1 and 7.1.2 read with paragraph 8.1 of the Public... →
![Centre for Child Law and Others v Media 24 Limited and Others (23871/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 313](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000664047_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary1022.jpg)
Centre for Child Law and Others v Media 24 Limited and Others (23871/15) [2017] ZAGPPHC 313
13th July 2017 [1] It is our Constitutional duty as society and the courts to protect the rights of children as is enshrined in the Bill of Rights and the... →
![South African National Editors Forum and Others v Black First Land First and Others (23897/17) [2017] ZAGPJHC 179](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000662621_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary1022.jpg)
South African National Editors Forum and Others v Black First Land First and Others (23897/17) [2017] ZAGPJHC 179
7th July 2017 [1] The life of a journalist is not easy. The profession of a journalist, and in particular that of an investigative journalist, is seldom... →
OGOD vs Laerskool Randhart & Others
28th June 2017 The high court in Johannesburg ruled on Wednesday that no public school could adhere to and promote one religion. Last month, an application by the... →
![Naidu v Reserve Bank of the Republic of South Africa and Another (9898/2016) [2017] ZAKZDHC 25](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000659279_resized_gavel2legallaw1022.jpg)
Naidu v Reserve Bank of the Republic of South Africa and Another (9898/2016) [2017] ZAKZDHC 25
23rd June 2017 [1] This is an urgent application instituted by the applicant,[1] in which he seeks the following relief: ‘(a) To revoke and suspend the trading... →
![Mpayipheli v Minister of Social Development and Another (3956/16) [2017] ZAECMHC 15](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000657134_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary1022.jpg)
Mpayipheli v Minister of Social Development and Another (3956/16) [2017] ZAECMHC 15
15th June 2017 [1] The issue raised in this application can best be understood against the background of the relevant statutory matrix. [2] Section 18 of the... →
![National Director pf Public Prosecutions v Mtwazi and Others (441/2016) [2017] ZAECBHC 4](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000655675_resized_gavel2legallaw1022.jpg)
National Director pf Public Prosecutions v Mtwazi and Others (441/2016) [2017] ZAECBHC 4
9th June 2017 [1] On 23 August 2016 the applicant obtained a provisional restraint order against the parties pursuant to the provisions of section 26 of the... →
![Swart and Others v Fourie and Others (2488/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 58](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000652278_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary1022.jpg)
Swart and Others v Fourie and Others (2488/2017) [2017] ZAWCHC 58
26th May 2017 The applicants in this matter were subpoenaed, in terms of s 414 of the Companies Act 61 of 1973 (‘the Act’), to appear for examination at a... →
![Director of Public Prosecutions Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg v Regional Magistrate, Krugersdorp and Another (2016/20222) [2017] ZAGPJHC 119](https://cisp.cachefly.net/assets/articles/images/resized_medium/0000650522_resized_legallawgaveljudiciary221022.jpg)
Director of Public Prosecutions Gauteng Local Division, Johannesburg v Regional Magistrate, Krugersdorp and Another (2016/20222) [2017] ZAGPJHC 119
19th May 2017 The applicant, the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP), seeks to review a decision of the first respondent, a regional magistrate, which decision... →
