https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / News / All News RSS ← Back
Africa|Automotive|Gas|Steel
Africa|Automotive|Gas|Steel
africa|automotive|gas|steel
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

South Africa will continue to pursue trade deal with US despite Trump’s letter confirming 30% tariff


Close

Embed Video

South Africa will continue to pursue trade deal with US despite Trump’s letter confirming 30% tariff

President Cyril Ramaphosa and President Donal Trump talk during what was a hostile Oval Office meeting on May 21
President Cyril Ramaphosa and President Donal Trump talk during what was a hostile Oval Office meeting on May 21

8th July 2025

By: Terence Creamer
Creamer Media Editor

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

President Cyril Ramaphosa says South Africa will continue with its diplomatic efforts towards a more balanced and mutually beneficial trade relationship with the US after having received a letter from President Donald Trump indicating that a 30% tariff will be imposed on South African goods from August 1.

In a July 7 letter, Trump said the 30% tariff had been implemented to address “long-term, and very persistent, trade deficits engendered by South Africa’s tariff, non-tariff, policies and trade barriers” that meant the relationship was “far from reciprocal”.

Advertisement

No specific mention was made of a threat to impose an additional 10% on countries that support what Trump termed the “anti-American policies of BRICS”, of which South Africa is a member.

Similar letters were sent to several other countries and came despite recent calls from South Africa for a 90-day pause on the imposition of the reciprocal tariff announced by Trump on April 2 to be extended to allow time for a deal to be finalised, after South Africa submitted a proposed framework agreement to the US on May 20.

Advertisement

In the final paragraph of his letter, the US President indicated that adjustments could be considered to the tariff outlined, should South Africa “open your heretofore closed trading markets to the United States, and eliminate your tariff, non-tariff, policies and trade barriers”.

In his response, Ramaphosa welcomed the commitment by the US government indicating that the “30% tariff is subject to modification at the back of the conclusion of our negotiations with the United States”.

“South Africa will continue with its diplomatic efforts towards a more balanced and mutually beneficial trade relationship with the United States,” Ramaphosa noted, while adding that South Africa still awaited a “template” from the US in relation to its approach to sub-Saharan Africa on matters of trade.

South Africa became aware of the template at a meeting held on the sidelines of the US-Africa Summit on June 23 in Luanda, Angola, but had not been provided with details.

Therefore, Ramaphosa had instructed South Africa’s negotiators to urgently engage with the US on the basis of the Framework Deal that South Africa submitted to the US on May 20, the day before his hostile Oval Office meeting with Trump, which was televised internationally.

The proposed agreement included what South Africa has termed “reciprocal benefits”, including buying gas from the US and addressing long-standing disagreements in the areas of beef, pork and poultry, in return for concessions for South African steel and automotive exports, as well as an intensification of counter-seasonal agricultural trade.

“This framework deal addresses the issues initially raised by the US, including South Africa’s supposed trade surplus, unfair trade practices and lack of reciprocity from the US.”

However, Ramaphosa also continues to contest the accuracy of the 30% ‘reciprocal’ tariff  calculation.

“South Africa maintains that the 30% reciprocal tariff is not an accurate representation of available trade data.

“In our interpretation of the available trade data, the average tariff on imported goods entering South Africa stands at 7.6%.

“Importantly, 56% of goods enter South Africa at 0% most favoured nation tariff, with 77% of US goods entering the South African market under the 0% duty.”

However, in a possible indication that Ramaphosa was not entirely confident of a breakthrough with the US, he urged government trade negotiation teams and South African companies to accelerate their diversification efforts “in order to promote better resilience in both global supply chains and the South African economy”.

Unless a breakthrough is made, however, the 30% tariff would apply to all South African exports, except those specifically exempted, such as products such as platinum group metals, gold, and chrome. Automotive, steel, and aluminium exports would be subjected to a separate set of tariffs of between 25% to 50%.

Meanwhile, Parliamentary Select Committee on Economic Development and Trade chairperson Sonja Boshoff called for swift diplomatic action by the South African government ahead of the August 1.

In a statement she called for a high-level delegation to be sent to Washington “to undertake repair of diplomatic ties and to reaffirm South Africa’s commitment to constructive engagement”.

“We cannot afford diplomatic dithering. Every delay will deepen the uncertainty in our export industries. The government must urgently finalise a sustainable trade path with the United States and, simultaneously, accelerate diversification into new markets across the EU, Asia and Africa,” Boshoff said.

Trade union Solidarity, which together with AfriForum was criticised by Ramaphosa for running the disinformation campaign that arguably formed the basis for Trump’s discredited Oval Office claims of a “white genocide” in South Africa, also saw scope for further negotiation.

CEO Dr Dirk Hermann said in a statement that the South African government had every opportunity to conclude a positive trade agreement with the US.

However, he again criticised government for its “tone deafness”, arguing that government “never listened to what their most important trading partner wanted and did not show understanding for our dependence on American trade”.

North-West University Business School’s Professor Raymond Parsons said the potential negative economic impact of the tariffs should not be underestimated.

“For now, the most vulnerable sectors for South Africa, such as agriculture and cars, remain badly affected unless last-minute negotiations can still ameliorate the situation by August 1,” Parsons said.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za