https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / All Case Law RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Scholtz v NDPP (69/2018) [2019] ZASCA 136

Close

Embed Video

Scholtz v NDPP (69/2018) [2019] ZASCA 136

Scholtz v NDPP (69/2018) [2019] ZASCA 136

11th October 2019

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Click here to read the full judgment on Saflii

[1] There are two applications that have to be considered in this matter. The main one is an application for leave to appeal against a confiscation order granted by the Northern Cape Division of the High Court, Kimberley (court a quo) against the first to seventh applicants in terms of s 18 of Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 (POCA). The second application is ancillary to the main one and is an application for condonation of the late filing of the main application. Both applications were first considered by this court on 22 March 2018 and were referred for oral argument in terms of s 17(2) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013. The court also ordered the parties to be prepared, if called upon to do so, to address it on the merits of the appeal against the confiscation order.

Advertisement

[2] The first to seventh applicants were convicted in the court a quo on counts of corruption and money laundering. Subsequent to the convictions, an enquiry was held in terms of s 18 of POCA and, on 6 December 2016, the court made the confiscation order which is the subject of this application for leave to appeal. The amounts ordered to be confiscated were R6 043 960.15 and R53 763 021.85 respectively, against all the applicants, jointly and severally, the one paying the other to be absolved. The total amount was R59 806 982.00. Subsequent to the convictions and the confiscation order, the court a quo sentenced the applicants as follows:

a) the first applicant was sentenced to 15 years imprisonment on each of the two counts of corruption and 12 years imprisonment on each of the two counts of money laundering. The court ordered that the sentences imposed be served concurrently.

Advertisement

b) the second to seventh applicants were each sentenced to a fine of R150 000 on a count of  corruption and second and third applicants were sentenced to a fine of   R75 000 on the money laundering count.

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za