https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / Supreme Court of Appeal RSS ← Back
Business|Coal|Exploration|Resources
Business|Coal|Exploration|Resources
business|coal|exploration|resources
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Oakbay Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others (1274/2019) [2021] ZASCA 59

Close

Embed Video

Oakbay Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others (1274/2019) [2021] ZASCA 59

Oakbay Investments (Pty) Ltd v Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd and Others (1274/2019) [2021] ZASCA 59

21st May 2021

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Read the full judgment on Saflii

In February 2018, eight companies in the Oakbay Group were placed in voluntary business rescue after the four major South African banks decided to terminate their banking facilities, rendering them commercially insolvent.[1] Among the companies were the first respondent, Tegeta Exploration and Resources (Pty) Ltd (Tegeta), and its three wholly-owned subsidiaries, Optimum  Coal Mine (Pty) Ltd (OCM), Koornfontein Mines (Pty) Ltd (Koornfontein) and Optimum Coal Terminal (Pty) Ltd (OCT). Oakbay Investments (Pty) Ltd (Oakbay), the applicant and the company that controlled the group, was not placed in business rescue. It was represented in these proceedings, which were commenced on 16 November 2018, by Ms Ragavan, the acting Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the Oakbay Group. She deposed to the founding and replying affidavits and sought the removal from office of Messrs Knoop and Klopper, the second and third respondents and the appointed business rescue practitioners (the BRPs) of Tegeta. The application was dismissed by Potterill J in the Gauteng Division of the High Court, Pretoria and she refused leave to appeal. This court referred Oakbay's application for such leave for argument in terms of s 17(2)(d) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013.

Advertisement
To watch Creamer Media's latest video reports, click here
 
Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za