https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / High Courts RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Matiwane v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2047/2018) [2019] ZAECMHC 23


Close

Matiwane v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2047/2018) [2019] ZAECMHC 23

Should you have feedback on this article, please complete the fields below.

Please indicate if your feedback is in the form of a letter to the editor that you wish to have published. If so, please be aware that we require that you keep your feedback to below 300 words and we will consider its publication online or in Creamer Media’s print publications, at Creamer Media’s discretion.

We also welcome factual corrections and tip-offs and will protect the identity of our sources, please indicate if this is your wish in your feedback below.


Close

Embed Video

Matiwane v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2047/2018) [2019] ZAECMHC 23

Matiwane v President of the Republic of South Africa and Others (2047/2018) [2019] ZAECMHC 23

23rd May 2019

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Click here to read the full judgment on Saflii

[1]        At the heart of this application lies a claim for the official recognition and reinstatement of the kingship of AmaMpondomise[1], a traditional community whose members reside in the main in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa.

Advertisement

[2]        The applicant is amongst those AmaMpondomise who hold competing claims for recognition as king.  In the founding affidavit he describes himself as “the senior Chief of AmaMpondomise”.  The fifth respondent in this application describes himself as “a great grandson of the AmaMpondomise King Dosini Royal Family”, which is the sixth respondent herein.

[3]        The first to the fourth respondents, being the President of the Republic of South Africa, the Minister of Co-operative Governance and Traditional Affairs, the Government of the Republic of South Africa and the Commission for Traditional Leaders respectively, were all cited nomine officio by the applicant in these proceedings.  The fifth and the sixth respondents were not cited as parties.  At the hearing of the application they presented themselves at court armed with a substantive application for joinder as parties.

Advertisement

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      ARTICLE ENQUIRY      FEEDBACK

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here


About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za