https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Financial
Financial
financial
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Gauteng MEC Maile’s weak approach to corruption allows former CEO to avoid jail


Close

Gauteng MEC Maile’s weak approach to corruption allows former CEO to avoid jail

Should you have feedback on this article, please complete the fields below.

Please indicate if your feedback is in the form of a letter to the editor that you wish to have published. If so, please be aware that we require that you keep your feedback to below 300 words and we will consider its publication online or in Creamer Media’s print publications, at Creamer Media’s discretion.

We also welcome factual corrections and tip-offs and will protect the identity of our sources, please indicate if this is your wish in your feedback below.


Close

Embed Video

Gauteng MEC Maile’s weak approach to corruption allows former CEO to avoid jail

Gauteng MEC Maile’s weak approach to corruption allows former CEO to avoid jail

25th November 2025

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) in Gauteng uncovered an incident where a former Gauteng Gambling Board (GGB) Chief Executive Officer (CEO), took out a loan from the Board but instead of paying it back personally, he got an NGO to pay off his loan. Even worse, he got the Board to pay back the NGO from gambling fines paid by illegal operators.

Despite a forensic investigation conducted by SkX Proviti and provided to the Office of the Premier highlighting unlawful actions and money laundering by the former GGB CEO, no disciplinary actions were conducted, and no criminal charges were laid against him.
This information was revealed by the Gauteng MEC for Economic Development, Lebogang Maile, in a written reply to the DA’s questions tabled in the Gauteng Provincial Legislature (GPL).

Advertisement

According to MEC Maile, the findings of the forensic report indicated that disciplinary action must be taken against the CEO for him to answer the following charges; financial misconduct in terms of Section 81 of the Public Financial Management Act (PFMA) and gross misrepresentation, corruption and money laundering as contemplated in Section 4 and 5 of the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998.

Despite this clear evidence of corruption, gross financial misconduct and using a charity organisation as a front to steal public funds, the CEO was allowed to enter a settlement and walk away, after having been on precautionary suspension.

Advertisement

The settlement amount was not disclosed. According to the MEC it was “well-calculated”. The formal disciplinary hearing “was expected to be lengthy and costly”. Not only did the CEO avoid disciplinary action, no criminal action was taken.

This weak approach to corruption has allowed senior officials and politicians to avoid accountability, which is crippling Gauteng's provincial departments and entities. In this particular case, the MEC risks being criminally liable in terms of the Prevention and Combating of Corrupt Activities Act for ignoring corruption.

We demand full disclosure of the loan amount and the settlement amount. We demand to know the relationship between this organisation and the former CEO to ascertain whether an NGO had been used as a front, not only to repay loans on his behalf. Further investigation should be conducted to see how other funds paid to this NGO were used. Criminal charges must be opened against the former CEO. The DA will not let this matter be swept under the carpet. If GGB fails to open criminal charges, the DA will. We are taking legal advice in terms of possible charges against MEC Maile for ignoring corruption.

A DA-led Gauteng Provincial Government would not have allowed the settlement to avoid accountability. We would have implemented the disciplinary action against the former CEO, opened criminal charges, and recovered the stolen money. We would have taken firm action against corruption.

 

Issued by Mike Moriarty MPL - DA Gauteng Shadow MEC for Economic Development

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      ARTICLE ENQUIRY      FEEDBACK

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here


About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za