https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Case Law / All Case Law RSS ← Back
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (CCT 184/23) [2025] ZACC 8


Close

Embed Video

Democratic Alliance v Minister of Home Affairs and Another (CCT 184/23) [2025] ZACC 8

Legal gavel

7th May 2025

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

Read the full judgment on Saflii

[1]            In Chisuse,[1] this Court observed that “[c]itizenship is the gateway through which a number of rights in the Constitution can be accessed.  It enables a person to enjoy freedom of movement, freedom of trade, and political representation.”[2]  This case concerns a constitutional challenge against section 6(1)(a) (the impugned provision) of the South African Citizenship Act[3] (the Act).  That provision causes South African citizens to lose their citizenship automatically if they voluntarily acquire citizenship in another country, unless they have prior permission from the Minister of Home Affairs.  In relevant part, the impugned provision reads:

Advertisement

“(1)      Subject to the provisions of subsection (2), a South African citizen shall cease to be a South African citizen if—

(a)        [that citizen], whilst not being a minor, by some voluntary and formal act other than marriage, acquires the citizenship or nationality of a country other than the Republic . . .

Advertisement

. . .

(2)      Any person referred to in subsection (1) may, prior to [their] loss of South African citizenship in terms of this section, apply to the Minister to retain [their] South African citizenship, and the Minister may, if [they] deem it fit, order such retention.”

[2]            The Supreme Court of Appeal declared the impugned provision constitutionally invalid from the date of its promulgation on 6 October 1995.[4]  That Court made an ancillary order declaring that those citizens who had lost their citizenship by virtue of that section, are deemed not to have lost their citizenship.  Lastly, it made a costs order against the respondents.  The matter is before this Court for confirmation of the order of constitutional invalidity, in terms of section 167(5), read with section 172(2)(a) of the Constitution, and further read with rule 16 of this Court’s Rules.  Although the respondents abide the decision of this Court, we are obliged to consider the constitutionality of the section to assess whether the declaration of invalidity must be confirmed.[5]

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za