https://newsletter.po.creamermedia.com
Deepening Democracy through Access to Information
Home / Statements RSS ← Back
Africa|Infrastructure|Power|Roads|Infrastructure
Africa|Infrastructure|Power|Roads|Infrastructure
africa|infrastructure|power|roads|infrastructure
Close

Email this article

separate emails by commas, maximum limit of 4 addresses

Sponsored by

Close

Article Enquiry

DA’s court challenge against Expropriation Act begins


Close

Embed Video

DA’s court challenge against Expropriation Act begins

DA’s court challenge against Expropriation Act begins
Photo by Reuters

10th February 2025

ARTICLE ENQUIRY      SAVE THIS ARTICLE      EMAIL THIS ARTICLE

Font size: -+

/ MEDIA STATEMENT / The content on this page is not written by Polity.org.za, but is supplied by third parties. This content does not constitute news reporting by Polity.org.za.

The DA has filed papers in the High Court to challenge the recently signed Expropriation Act, because the Act is unconstitutional, both substantively and procedurally.

The DA’s papers were filed, electronically, in the Western Cape High Court on Friday 7 February 2025.

Advertisement

During the process in the 6th (previous) Parliament to pass the Act, the DA was unequivocal: We reject this Act, because we believe that no government in a democratic country should be given such sweeping powers to expropriate property without compensation.

We have not forgotten that the apartheid government used similar powers to forcibly remove communities from their land, often with inadequate compensation or none at all. This history teaches us that true redress requires protecting property rights, ensuring that no government is ever given unchecked expropriation powers ever again.

Advertisement

It is for this reason that the DA will fight to ensure that every South African can have their property rights defended, protected and advanced.

The Presidency announced that the Act was signed into law in December 2024, against the advice of the Minister of Public Works and Infrastructure, Dean Macpherson, who provided the president with a legal opinion that there were issues with the Bill that rendered it unconstitutional.

The DA has asked the Court for an order that will nullify the Expropriation Act in its current form.

The DA’s challenge to the Act is both substantive and procedural, and includes:

⁠The process of adopting the Act did not conform to the Constitution. Five out of the seven provinces that voted for the Act in the National Council of Provinces, did so without obtaining a provincial mandate in the manner prescribed by law and regulations; and

⁠The Act is vague and contradictory in several clauses, which renders it unconstitutional.

The purpose of this court action is to have the Act nullified in its entirety.

Apart from compelling legal shortcomings, the DA strongly opposes the substance of the Act, which seeks to fulfil the mandate of the ANC’s elective conference in 2017, which mandated the ANC to include expropriation without compensation as an instrument of law.

After the DA defeated the ANC’s plan to amend Section 25 of the Constitution to enable expropriation without compensation, amending this Act became a blunt instrument of ANC majoritarianism in the last Parliament.

There are at least three other Acts that deal with restitution for injustices of the past that give meaning to Section 25 of the Constitution, and where the DA governs, we are facilitating just and fair compensation in terms of these laws (the Restitution of Land Rights Act, and two Land Reform Acts).

In the current Expropriation Act we reject the ANC trying to smuggle in further powers of expropriation without compensation in an Act that is meant to provide for expropriation in circumstances where the state needs to develop infrastructure such as roads, railways and dams. Every country has legislation to ensure that the state can, with fair compensation, build public infrastructure, but this Act goes too far outside of these accepted international norms.

In the passage and signature of the Expropriation Act, the ANC wants to dramatically widen the purview of expropriation, and keep the window for land restitution open indefinitely.

However, the ANC is no longer in power on its own.

The voters require the ANC to be in a coalition, and the ANC is bound by a signed Statement of Intent for a coalition with the DA. This means that they cannot simply proceed to implement resolutions of ANC elective conferences. The ANC now has to share power for the first time in our democratic history, and the DA will not stand by and allow the ANC to act as though they won a majority.

We will stand up for our positions and commitments to the people of South Africa.

 

Issued by Helen Zille - DA Federal Council Chairperson

EMAIL THIS ARTICLE      SAVE THIS ARTICLE ARTICLE ENQUIRY

To subscribe email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za or click here
To advertise email advertising@creamermedia.co.za or click here

Comment Guidelines

About

Polity.org.za is a product of Creamer Media.
www.creamermedia.co.za

Other Creamer Media Products include:
Engineering News
Mining Weekly
Research Channel Africa

Read more

Subscriptions

We offer a variety of subscriptions to our Magazine, Website, PDF Reports and our photo library.

Subscriptions are available via the Creamer Media Store.

View store

Advertise

Advertising on Polity.org.za is an effective way to build and consolidate a company's profile among clients and prospective clients. Email advertising@creamermedia.co.za

View options

Email Registration Success

Thank you, you have successfully subscribed to one or more of Creamer Media’s email newsletters. You should start receiving the email newsletters in due course.

Our email newsletters may land in your junk or spam folder. To prevent this, kindly add newsletters@creamermedia.co.za to your address book or safe sender list. If you experience any issues with the receipt of our email newsletters, please email subscriptions@creamermedia.co.za